<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LC Subject Headings are Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/</link>
	<description>traversing life with words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I see no reason we cannot have our cake and eat it to â€” by permitting user tagging to be included in full text search AND offering the subject search for those who need more precise results. &lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s the most reasonable thing I&#039;ve read in a long time! No need to throw out one method to add another. There might be a user out there somewhere who loves LCSH. Unlikely but possible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I see no reason we cannot have our cake and eat it to â€” by permitting user tagging to be included in full text search AND offering the subject search for those who need more precise results. </i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the most reasonable thing I&#8217;ve read in a long time! No need to throw out one method to add another. There might be a user out there somewhere who loves LCSH. Unlikely but possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly G</title>
		<link>http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 20:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>Jane--
I see no reason we cannot have our cake and eat it to -- by permitting user tagging to be included in full text search AND offering the subject search for those who need more precise results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane&#8211;<br />
I see no reason we cannot have our cake and eat it to &#8212; by permitting user tagging to be included in full text search AND offering the subject search for those who need more precise results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly G</title>
		<link>http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve participated in this conversation many times within the taxonomy community! I don&#039;t know that &quot;afraid&quot; is the operative term :)

I&#039;m assuming you are talking about using tagging on a specific resource (perhaps a library OPAC or intranet).
I find that internal and focused collections really need the structured terminology more than the enormous collection we call the World Wide Web.

The short answer is that loose tagging is a great way to provide *additional* access points and gather potential updates to an internal controlled vocabulary. However tagging alone can muddy the results.
(I will continue to answer on my blog)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve participated in this conversation many times within the taxonomy community! I don&#8217;t know that &#8220;afraid&#8221; is the operative term <img src='http://wanderingeyre.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming you are talking about using tagging on a specific resource (perhaps a library OPAC or intranet).<br />
I find that internal and focused collections really need the structured terminology more than the enormous collection we call the World Wide Web.</p>
<p>The short answer is that loose tagging is a great way to provide *additional* access points and gather potential updates to an internal controlled vocabulary. However tagging alone can muddy the results.<br />
(I will continue to answer on my blog)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ranger</title>
		<link>http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2233</link>
		<dc:creator>ranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/#comment-2233</guid>
		<description>While I love the complexity and ensuing hilarity of LC subject headings (Moon Pies, Juvenile Fiction anyone?), they are not useful for patrons.  Tag away, I say, now that we have that technology just waiting to be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I love the complexity and ensuing hilarity of LC subject headings (Moon Pies, Juvenile Fiction anyone?), they are not useful for patrons.  Tag away, I say, now that we have that technology just waiting to be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua m. neff</title>
		<link>http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua m. neff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingeyre.com/2006/06/05/lc-subject-headings-are-dead/#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>Honestly? I think we&#039;re afraid of having gone to grad school for nothing. The reasoning goes like this:

1) If patrons and paraprofessionals are just as qualified as I am to make decisions about the library and its collections,

2) Then my grad degree is worthless and I am nobody special.

Or maybe I&#039;m wrong. Maybe we&#039;re just afraid that space monkeys will invade the planet if we abandon LC subject headings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly? I think we&#8217;re afraid of having gone to grad school for nothing. The reasoning goes like this:</p>
<p>1) If patrons and paraprofessionals are just as qualified as I am to make decisions about the library and its collections,</p>
<p>2) Then my grad degree is worthless and I am nobody special.</p>
<p>Or maybe I&#8217;m wrong. Maybe we&#8217;re just afraid that space monkeys will invade the planet if we abandon LC subject headings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
