http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/ traversing life with words Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:01:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-14503 What’s More Boring Than a Conference of Librarians: Personal Debriefing of the OK-ACRL Workshop « Imposed Blog Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:47:29 +0000 http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/#comment-14503 [...] were no less interesting. In many ways, our lunchtime colloquy reminded me of Michelle Boule’s “We Got 2.0 Librarians, Not 2.0 Libraries.” In particular, two of the librarians discussed the challenges of teaching a room full of [...] [...] were no less interesting. In many ways, our lunchtime colloquy reminded me of Michelle Boule’s “We Got 2.0 Librarians, Not 2.0 Libraries.” In particular, two of the librarians discussed the challenges of teaching a room full of [...]

]]> http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-13477 Library 2.0 Roundup - Redux « Life as I Know It Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:14:37 +0000 http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/#comment-13477 [...] We Got 2.0 Librarians, But Not 2.0 Libraries - posted on September 20, 2007 [...] [...] We Got 2.0 Librarians, But Not 2.0 Libraries – posted on September 20, 2007 [...]

]]> http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-13474 The Real Pangs of Librarian 2.0 « The Other Librarian Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:58:05 +0000 http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/#comment-13474 [...] Community Development, Professional Development, library2, slowlibrary Michelle Boule recently responded to my Librarian 2.0 / Library 2.0 post with a response of her own. In it she [...] [...] Community Development, Professional Development, library2, slowlibrary Michelle Boule recently responded to my Librarian 2.0 / Library 2.0 post with a response of her own. In it she [...]

]]> http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-13420 Jane Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:14:28 +0000 http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/#comment-13420 Jenny, it is so funny you made the peas comment as we, at MPOW, were arguing about the Eat Your Peas version of librarianship on Wednesday. We have both factions here and they sometimes make discussing instruction a frustrating endeavor. Neither side likes the others' answers. Jenny, it is so funny you made the peas comment as we, at MPOW, were arguing about the Eat Your Peas version of librarianship on Wednesday. We have both factions here and they sometimes make discussing instruction a frustrating endeavor. Neither side likes the others’ answers.

]]> http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-13411 Jenny Levine Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:30:38 +0000 http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/#comment-13411 hallelujah and pass the peas - nicely said. hallelujah and pass the peas – nicely said.

]]> http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-13410 lauren Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:55:35 +0000 http://wanderingeyre.com/2007/09/20/we-got-20-librarians-not-20-libraries/#comment-13410 I've been dipping in and out of my reader the past few weeks, and missed the height of the "We Got 2.0 Librarians, Not 2.0 Libraries" discussion. I think you are totally onto the main issue. I wonder if the appearance of a large number of Librarian 2.0s is just because this particular breed of librarian blogs a lot and is more visible because of a web presence. Those of us who would put ourselves into the L*ian2 category may have the experience you describe, wondering why there aren’t more. This leads to slow change if we're one of just a few in a larger workplace. I'm with ya, waiting for (and recruiting) a larger number L*ian2s. And I can’t wait for the day when there are more L*ian2s in positions of official power. Until then, I stay motivated and invigorated by the blogs, podcasts, and tweets throughout the day. I might be one of just a few L*ian2s at work, but there are a bunch of us out there, with similar interests and passions. Thank goodness for the web's strength of bringing together the long tail! Thanks for the great post! I’ve been dipping in and out of my reader the past few weeks, and missed the height of the “We Got 2.0 Librarians, Not 2.0 Libraries” discussion. I think you are totally onto the main issue. I wonder if the appearance of a large number of Librarian 2.0s is just because this particular breed of librarian blogs a lot and is more visible because of a web presence. Those of us who would put ourselves into the L*ian2 category may have the experience you describe, wondering why there aren’t more. This leads to slow change if we’re one of just a few in a larger workplace. I’m with ya, waiting for (and recruiting) a larger number L*ian2s. And I can’t wait for the day when there are more L*ian2s in positions of official power. Until then, I stay motivated and invigorated by the blogs, podcasts, and tweets throughout the day. I might be one of just a few L*ian2s at work, but there are a bunch of us out there, with similar interests and passions. Thank goodness for the web’s strength of bringing together the long tail! Thanks for the great post!

]]>